Author Archive

Digital Dermatology
Posted by Andy Stafford | Thursday, December 8th, 2011

Reading this article and discussion on treating eczema got me thinking (http://ow.ly/7SPaW ) about the need for more effective treatment. There seems to be a massive gap for a properly resourced digital platform for people with dermatology problems. I am myself an ‘atopic triad’ (sounds cool, but just means I’m delicate) and have found GPs to be a little uninterested in skin problems, and dermatologists to be pretty underwhelming in their ability to prescribe a solution. And even much less motivated to tackle the cause. There probably are some really good ones, but looking at various online discussions it appears that they are in the minority. (more…)

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Yahoo Buzz Buzz This Post Post to Delicious Delicious Post to Facebook Facebook Post to Reddit Reddit

Reducing Obesity Through Digital Technology
Posted by Andy Stafford | Monday, December 5th, 2011

First things first, I’m going to fess up; I’ve been bad. I haven’t blogged for some months. I’ve wanted to, honestly, but it’s managing to combine something interesting with urgency that’s the key for me. Up in this post: obesity, infographics and ‘gamification’.

The inspiration for this post came when someone alerted me (and the rest of their Twitter followers) to Google’s NGRAM service. This allows the user to see on a graph the incidence of specific words and phrases that have been included in books over time since around 1600!

After a few minutes of messing around with various keywords, I reverted to a little obsession that I have with a very modern problem; obesity. The ‘obesity’ keyword in turn was probably triggered by the recent news that the UK is now the proud home to the largest men and women in Europe. (more…)

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Yahoo Buzz Buzz This Post Post to Delicious Delicious Post to Facebook Facebook Post to Reddit Reddit

Google + in a nutshell
Posted by Andy Stafford | Thursday, July 14th, 2011
Google +

think of the possibilities...

You may, just may, have heard about Google’s latest foray into social networking with ‘Google +’ and if so, like most people, you probably want to know why you need to know about it. Rather than write a blog post about it, I’ve found a nice little blog post for you that basically reassures you that you don’t need to worry about it. It’s for geeks like us working online – for now….

In a nutshell it is a way to filter the noise from all the people you will already be following, listening to, or connected to in some way. If you’re on LinkedIn, have RSS, email alerts, or are more connected via Twitter, Facebook and a plethora of other networks you may see the sense in organising your feeds into friends, relatives, acquaintances, colleagues, industry peers, similar interests, etc.

I can certainly see the benefits of organising people into distinct groups that allow us greater control over what we listen to and who we communicate with.

It has 10M+ users already and is expected to hit 20M by the weekend, and i thought that it was a limited, soft launch….

Scobleizer

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Yahoo Buzz Buzz This Post Post to Delicious Delicious Post to Facebook Facebook Post to Reddit Reddit

Google Vs Facebook
Posted by Andy Stafford | Tuesday, April 5th, 2011


In the style of the MTV celebrity death matches from a few years ago (are MTV still around?), Facebook and Google are one hell of a grudge match, whether they say so or not. They’re two of the biggest hitters out there on the web , but I’m not sure that one will be submitting or tapping out anytime soon. For now they have sewn up one each of the two key elements of how we all spend our time online (let’s ignore email for now).

Both definitely want ‘in on’ the others ‘domain’. Facebook want to integrate web searching and buying, and Google wants to integrate our social lives into the SERPs. If either succeed they will make a serious dent into the others market. Google will increasingly use social criteria to enhance the relevance of the results and therefore increase their significance for advertises. If Facebook on the other hand, can integrate searching and buying activity within their community to effectively harness e-commerce across communities they will act as a huge super-affiliate; a ramped up Groupon, and then some. (more…)

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Yahoo Buzz Buzz This Post Post to Delicious Delicious Post to Facebook Facebook Post to Reddit Reddit

What is Wikileaks?
Posted by Andy Stafford | Thursday, December 9th, 2010

Wikileaks is a website that publishes anonymous submissions and leaks from official sources that typically come from governments, religious groups, corporate or other influential and powerful organisations.  It’s online, so there’s no limit to the audience that it can generate, and the source of the leaks it can attract.  It attempts to preserve the anonymity of the contributor, but checks the validity of the source before publishing. (more…)

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Yahoo Buzz Buzz This Post Post to Delicious Delicious Post to Facebook Facebook Post to Reddit Reddit

Is the iPad the saviour of the newspaper? 2
Posted by Andy Stafford | Thursday, October 21st, 2010

iPad news app, 'Pulse'
After turning off my iPhone alarm this morning I clicked through on a push alert from Mashable entitled, “Is the iPad the saviour of the newspaper industry”. It’s a topic I find really interesting for the following reasons;

• The newspaper was one of the first truly mass medias that everyone enjoyed
• They haven’t translated their business model to online successfully, in fact at all
• Newspapers are losing advertising revenue and circulation all the time
• They are in terminal decline

(more…)

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Yahoo Buzz Buzz This Post Post to Delicious Delicious Post to Facebook Facebook Post to Reddit Reddit

Wikipedia Wars
Posted by Andy Stafford | Tuesday, August 17th, 2010

The latest infographic (erm, information displayed visually) from the wonderful ‘Information is Beautiful’ looks at the most banal ongoing arguments that have been raging on between Wikipedia editors. For those of you that were under the impression that some articles are posted to a chorus of unified approval, whereas others involve some necessary lofty academic style debate over the validity of the facts may be a little surprised to see some of these edits. The debates range from the banal to the ridiculous, but one of the recurring themes hinges on U.S. and English spelling. Well, that’s one that will just run and run…. technology, no matter how social is not going to resolve that one.

You can see the original post here at ‘information is beautiful‘.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Yahoo Buzz Buzz This Post Post to Delicious Delicious Post to Facebook Facebook Post to Reddit Reddit

Physical Social Bookmarking
Posted by Andy Stafford | Monday, August 9th, 2010


I stumbled across http://itizen.com/ the other day whilst seeking inspiration for social gaming ideas. I love the Web 2.0 feel of the website and the basic idea of it. In a nutshell it boils down to the following concept; you tag an item, object or thing, and then you tell a story about it. Over time the story should evolve as the item is passed on encountered by new people.

It’s more quaint than business opportunity at the moment as it’s a real world extension of the basic Wikipedia concept; contributing to more freely accessible information for everyone who is interested, and for, well, in this case potentially pretty much everything. But it has a more social aspect to it. At the very least I can certainly see a social games emerging from these concepts- think treasure hunt with Foursquare (location based) and Twitter (real time) maybe?

Perhaps tags should include 3-D barcodes, NFC (like Oyster) tags and in the future DNA style tagging? Part of me wants to run away at the big brother potential of all this social technology and part of my revels in it. The Itzen concept is certainly very interesting but early days, so I’m looking forward to seeing if people adopt it.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Yahoo Buzz Buzz This Post Post to Delicious Delicious Post to Facebook Facebook Post to Reddit Reddit

Eyeforpharma Post 2.0
Posted by Andy Stafford | Thursday, March 25th, 2010

It’s a month since Eyeforpharma and two weeks since I uploaded a survey for participant feedback- and the results are in. I can’t claim that 100% of attendees answered the survey because I would be lying, but a large enough number to warrant some thought and discussion did. Thank you so much to those sharers!

I’ll run through the percentages with a little commentary. If you’re not interested in being teased with a ‘slow reveal’ though just click down to the bottom of the posting for a table of the results.

100% did you enjoy Eyeforpharma (#efp) 2010!

(more…)

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Yahoo Buzz Buzz This Post Post to Delicious Delicious Post to Facebook Facebook Post to Reddit Reddit

Follow up to EyeforPharma
Posted by Andy Stafford | Thursday, March 11th, 2010

I’ve been back in the UK for a week now after a very busy and enjoyable two days in Berlin for the EyeforPharma (Twitter hashtag #efp) e-marketing conference. I was representing Nitro Digital so on duty at our stand, but fortunate enough to catch all the talks given by the brave souls willing to talk to the amassed crowd of 200 or so delegates.

I was impressed with the standard of the speeches, but overall I don’t think that the content was a massive departure from the previous year. The tone and enthusiasm from the speakers and those in the audience however, was different. What was interesting for me was that although this was about digital marketing everything seemed to come back to social media, or web2.0 (they’re catch-all phrases really). However, some of the more easily achieved digital marketing tactics are still not really embraced by pharma. It almost feels like a case of trying to run before you being able to walk.

To market around the ‘code’ restrictions using search engine marketing is much, much easier than using social media. Jonathan Richman recently made the case for email marketing in his excellent ‘Dose of Digital’, but I think ‘search’, both natural and paid, in the UK is even better. Build it and they will not come, but sign-post it to them in search engines and they will. The result? Bucket loads of relevant traffic. The hard part is in then providing quality content and engagement, but that’s a whole other issue (and a bit social).

I’m not knocking enthusiasm for social media. Not a bit of it, I love its potential for changing the landscape for communications, but specifically for HCP comm’s and ultimately patient care. It’s a shift for one to one communications, so it’s really important that people understand it and embrace it.

So, what I’d like to know from anyone at the #efp conference is, did the talks or any of the resulting discussion change anyone’s perception of social media in healthcare?


1. Did you enjoy eye for pharma (#efp) this year? Required Question
2. Did you learn about any marketing channels or tactics for engagement that you had not previously considered? Required Question
3. Has the conference eased any fears that you have about social media in this industry? Required Question
4. Would you now consider new ways to ‘engage’ with patients and healthcare professionals? Required Question
5. Will you be attending more digital pharma marketing events as a result of this one? Required Question



Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Yahoo Buzz Buzz This Post Post to Delicious Delicious Post to Facebook Facebook Post to Reddit Reddit